In this article, you will learn specific self-assessment methods that students can use to monitor their own learning and grow. I will introduce practical strategies to increase students’ motivation and accountability for learning, along with five examples of rubrics that can be used in the classroom right away. Summary of Key Content A variety of self-assessment rubric methods, from color coding to checklists Specific use cases applicable to each grade and subject An effective approach to developing students' critical thinking and learning initiatives. Precautions and step-by-step application guide when first introducing First, and most importantly, self-assessment should be an opportunity for students to truly reflect, not just give them a grade . Many teachers worry that students will be too lenient or focus only on their mistakes, but using the right rubric actually allows students to reflect more honestly and deeply on their learning. 🎨 Color Coding Self-Assessment Method This is the most effective method for elementary school students or beginners in self-assessment . Students express their level of performance using colors. ✅ How to use: Green : I completely understand and am confident Yellow : I mostly understand, but need a little help Red : Need more practice and help If you use this method during your 5th grade math problem solving time, you'll find that students can express themselves more freely and you'll be able to immediately identify who needs extra support. 📝 How to Make a Wish with a Star This is a particularly useful method for writing, presenting, and creative projects . ✅ Components: Stars : Write down 2-3 specific things you did well Wishes : 1-2 things you would like to improve next time

In this article, you will learn specific methods for creating customized evaluation criteria for each type of writing , as well as practical examples of their use. You will learn how to provide more accurate and effective feedback by setting evaluation criteria for each type of writing, such as persuasive writing, narrative writing, explanatory writing, and analytical writing. Summary of Key Content Need for differentiated evaluation criteria that match the characteristics of each type of writing Specific evaluation factors for persuasive, narrative, explanatory, and analytical writing Improve student understanding by setting clear expectations Increase teacher and student satisfaction through consistent assessment Practical rubric design methods and utilization strategies Why do you need a customized evaluation rubric? First and foremost, not all writing can be evaluated in the same way . The logical structure needed to write a persuasive essay and the creative storytelling skills needed to write a narrative essay are completely different areas. Existing standardized assessment forms have focused only on general elements such as “composition” and “grammar.” However, this method has made it difficult to properly evaluate the unique characteristics of each writing type. Using our custom assessment rubric : ✅ Ability to set clear expectations for each type of article ✅ Students’ understanding greatly improved ✅ Ensuring consistency in teacher evaluations Customized evaluation criteria by article type 1. Criteria for evaluating persuasive writing The most notable thing about persuasive writing is its strong argument and persuasive techniques . It is not simply about presenting an opinion, but rather a logical structure that can persuade the reader. Key Evaluation Factors: Clarity of argument : Is the claim clear and understandable? Persuasiveness of the evidence : Are credible sources and examples provided? Rebuttal logic : Did you consider the other party's opinion and provide an appropriate rebuttal?

Instant scoring of descriptive questions with AI automatic evaluation Fine-tune what students can see after submission Choose automated or manual review as you wish Maintaining full educator control throughout the process Innovation in descriptive assessment, AI automatic assessment Descriptive assignments such as essays, video responses, and visual projects are essential for developing students’ critical thinking skills. These types of assignments play an important role in developing creative thinking and deep analytical skills. However, providing personalized feedback to many students has been a huge time and effort consuming process, especially in large classes. Redmenta’s AI automated assessment system solves this problem. The moment a student submits a worksheet, the AI automatically starts grading it. This process happens in the background, so educators don’t have to take any action. Depending on how you approach the assessment process, you can choose between two options: Let AI handle assessments completely automatically: If you choose this option, students will receive feedback immediately after submission, allowing them to continue their learning process without interruption. Quick feedback allows students to immediately see how they are doing and make any necessary adjustments. Review and approve AI-generated feedback, then share it with students: This option gives educators the opportunity to review AI’s assessments and make corrections if necessary. This ensures the quality and accuracy of the feedback, and the educator’s professional judgment is reflected in the final decision. The system is designed to dramatically reduce assessment time while still allowing educators to maintain control. AI acts as an assessment assistant, not a replacement for educators. This allows educators to focus more time on developing course content and guiding students. A new way to manage student feedback Updated assessment settings let you choose what and when students can see after they submit. These settings are easily found on the worksheet’s preview or edit pages, and are now more clearly organized in a section previously known as “Author Settings.” There are three options to choose from to suit different educational situations: Show confirmation only (default) - Students will only receive a confirmation message that the worksheet has been successfully submitted, and will have to wait for the educator's approval. This option helps maintain fairness in the learning environment by ensuring that answers are not shared until all students have completed the assignment. It also gives the educator time to review all submissions and make adjustments if necessary. Performance Insights - Show students their scores and percentages, but hide the details of individual assignments. This option provides students with immediate performance feedback, while preventing assignment details from being shared with other students. It also ensures quality assessment, especially since essay questions still require educator approval. Detailed Results - All results and AI feedback are immediately visible. This option is ideal for self-directed learning environments or formative assessments, allowing students to immediately assess their performance and move on to the next step. When automatic AI assessment is enabled, students will receive AI-generated feedback on descriptive questions without the need for an educator to review them. These options allow educators to tailor the timing of feedback to different types of assignments, such as quizzes, essays, and projects, while ensuring the safety of assessments by preventing students from immediately sharing their answers with each other, which is important for maintaining the integrity of the learning process. A flexible system to suit your teaching style Redmenta’s new assessment system is designed to fit a variety of teaching styles and needs. Whether you prefer automation, manual control, or a mix of the two, it can adapt. Educators who prefer automation can save time by letting AI handle the assessment process. This is especially useful for educators who teach large classes or multiple classes. The AI performs the assessments with consistent criteria, and the educator can intervene when necessary. Educators who want more control can choose to review and approve AI-generated feedback before sharing it with students. This allows educators to leverage the effectiveness of AI while ensuring the quality and accuracy of feedback.