Trump's AI Plan: The "Beat China" Project
Key Takeaways: The Crossroads of Speed vs. Safety The Trump administration's AI action plan can be summarized in one sentence: "Let's get ahead of China first, and think about regulation later." 3 strategies at a glance • Accelerating innovation : deregulation, support for open-source AI, and expanded government adoption of AI. • Infrastructure construction : Large-scale construction of data centers and semiconductor factories, expansion of power grids. • International leadership : Exporting US AI to allies, blocking Chinese technology The real question: Is this really realistic? 1. The illusion of “neutral AI” The most ridiculous part of the document is the part where it promises to eliminate "ideological bias" in AI while simultaneously ensuring it reflects "American values." This is a contradiction. All AI cannot help but reflect the values of its creator. The very act of selecting data is already the beginning of bias. The same goes for calling DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) “social engineering” and excluding it. If we don’t take diversity into account, we are more likely to end up with more biased AI. 2. Environment comes second, power comes first Plans to significantly ease environmental regulations to build AI infrastructure are also short-term. A single data center consumes as much electricity as hundreds of thousands of households a year. An AI service like ChatGPT consumes 10 times more electricity than Google Search. In this situation, a “let’s build it first and see” approach without considering the environment is dangerous. Moreover, with natural disasters increasing due to climate change, what will happen if that infrastructure is damaged by typhoons or wildfires? 3. Possibility of backlash from allies Another problem is that the United States is pressuring its allies to choose between using our technology or using Chinese technology. Europe has already demonstrated its digital sovereignty with GDPR and recently passed the AI Act. Japan has also announced its own AI policy. In this situation, saying, “Use only American technology” will only increase the backlash. Are there any realistic alternatives? Gradual deregulation is the answer Rather than eliminating regulations altogether, it is better to selectively relax them only where necessary . For example, in fields directly related to life, such as medical AI or autonomous driving, safety verification will be strengthened, while in the gaming and entertainment fields, regulations will be relaxed. Building an international cooperation framework

1