Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

PepThink-R1: LLM for Interpretable Cyclic Peptide Optimization with CoT SFT and Reinforcement Learning

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Ruheng Wang, Hang Zhang, Trieu Nguyen, Shasha Feng, Hao-Wei Pang, Xiang Yu, Li Xiao, Peter Zhiping Zhang

Outline

PepThink-R1, a generative framework that integrates large-scale language models (LLMs), chain-of-thought (CoT) supervised learning, and reinforcement learning (RL), was proposed to address the challenges of the vast search space, limited experimental data, and poor interpretability of existing generative models in the process of therapeutic peptide design. PepThink-R1 explicitly infers monomer-level modifications during peptide sequence generation, enabling interpretable design choices while optimizing diverse pharmacological properties. Guided by a custom reward function that balances chemical feasibility and property improvement, the model autonomously explores various sequence variants. Experimental results demonstrate that PepThink-R1 generates cyclic peptides with significantly improved lipophilicity, stability, and exposure compared to conventional LLMs (e.g., GPT-5) and domain-specific baseline models, demonstrating superior performance in both optimization success rate and interpretability. This study presents the first LLM-based peptide design framework that combines explicit inference with RL-based feature control, marking a step forward for reliable and transparent therapeutic peptide optimization.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
By combining LLM, CoT, and RL, we simultaneously improved the interpretability and optimization efficiency of peptide design.
Increased transparency of the production process through explicit inference of monomer-level modifications.
We experimentally demonstrated the generation of cyclic peptides with improved lipophilicity, stability, and exposure compared to existing models.
It presents new possibilities for the optimization of reliable and transparent therapeutic peptides.
Limitations:
Further research is needed to investigate the generalization performance of the model presented in this study and its applicability to various peptide types.
There is a lack of detailed explanation of the design of custom reward functions and discussion of their generalizability.
Model performance can be affected by the size and diversity of experimental data.
Additional verification and supplementation are required for commercialization.
👍