Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymization

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Tobias Deu{\ss}er, Lorenz Sparrenberg, Armin Berger, Max Hahnbuck , Christian Bauckhage, Rafet Sifa

Outline

This paper highlights the need for robust anonymization techniques to ensure privacy and compliance while maintaining data usability for diverse and critical follow-up tasks, given the increasing prevalence of text data containing sensitive personal information across various fields. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of current trends and recent advances in text anonymization technologies. After discussing foundational approaches, primarily focused on Named Entity Recognition (NAMER), we examine the transformative impact of large-scale language models (LLMs), detailing their dual role as sophisticated anonymization tools and powerful deanonymization threats. We also explore domain-specific challenges and tailored solutions in critical fields such as healthcare, law, finance, and education. We examine advanced methodologies that integrate formal privacy-preserving models with risk-aware frameworks, and address the specialized subfield of author anonymization. Furthermore, we review an evaluation framework, comprehensive metrics, benchmarks, and a practical toolkit for real-world deployment of anonymization solutions. This paper aims to synthesize current knowledge, identify emerging trends and ongoing challenges, including the evolving privacy-utility tradeoff, the need to address quasi-identifiers, and the implications of LLM functionality, and suggest future research directions for both academics and practitioners in this field.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Comprehensively presents the current status and latest trends in text data anonymization technology in various fields.
An in-depth analysis of the dual role of anonymization and de-anonymization in LLM.
Providing domain-specific challenges and customized solutions.
Introducing advanced methodologies that consider formal privacy models and risk-aware frameworks.
Presenting evaluation frameworks, indicators, benchmarks, and toolkits for practical application.
Suggesting future research directions.
Limitations:
Lack of specific comparative analysis of the actual performance and efficiency of the solutions presented in the paper.
Given the pace of development in LLM, uncertainty exists about the long-term effectiveness of anonymization technologies.
The need for continuous monitoring and updates on new privacy threats and technological advancements.
A more in-depth solution to the quasi-identifiers problem is needed.
Lack of specific guidelines for comparative analysis of different anonymization techniques and selection of the optimal technique.
👍