Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Latent Adaptive Planner for Dynamic Manipulation

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Donghun Noh, Deqian Kong, Minglu Zhao, Andrew Lizarraga, Jianwen Xie, Ying Nian Wu, Dennis Hong

Outline

This paper presents the Latent Adaptive Planner (LAP), a latent variable-based policy for dynamic non-contact manipulation (e.g., box grasping). LAP infers plans in a low-dimensional latent space and is effectively trained using human demonstration videos. During execution, LAP maintains posterior probabilities for the latent plan and performs variational replanning as new observations arrive, achieving real-time adaptation. To bridge the implementation gap between humans and robots, we introduce a model-based proportional mapping that accurately recreates kinematic joint states and object positions from human demonstrations. Through challenging box grasping experiments with diverse object properties, LAP learns human-like compliant motions and adaptive behaviors, demonstrating excellent success rates, trajectory smoothness, and energy efficiency. Overall, LAP enables dynamic manipulation through real-time adaptation and successfully transfers across heterogeneous robot platforms using the same human demonstration videos.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Inference-based planning in low-dimensional latent spaces enables real-time adaptation and efficient dynamic contactless manipulation.
Effective learning through human demonstration videos and transferability across heterogeneous robot platforms.
Bridging the implementation gap between humans and robots through model-based proportional mapping.
Achieve superior performance (success rate, trajectory smoothness, energy efficiency) through human-like compliant behavior and adaptive behavior learning.
Limitations:
The paper lacks specific references to Limitations or constraints.
Further validation of generalization performance across diverse environments and objects is needed.
Need to assess dependence on the quantity and quality of training data.
Further experiments are needed to determine robustness in real-world environments.
👍