Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Limitations of Physics-Informed Neural Networks: a Study on Smart Grid Surrogation

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Julen Cestero, Carmine Delle Femine, Kenji S. Muro, Marco Quartulli, Marcello Restelli

Outline

This paper evaluates the application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which directly integrate physics into a learning framework, to smart grid modeling to address data scarcity and physical consistency issues. Through three experiments (interpolation, cross-validation, and episodic path prediction), we compare the performance of PINNs with XGBoost, Random Forest, and linear regression. PINNs trained using physics-based loss functions (power balancing, operational constraints, and grid stability enhancement) demonstrate superior generalization performance in terms of error reduction compared to data-driven models. Specifically, PINNs maintain a low MAE under dynamic grid operation and reliably capture state transitions in both random and expert-driven control scenarios, whereas existing models exhibit unstable performance. While PINNs exhibited some performance degradation under extreme operating conditions, they consistently maintained physical plausibility, demonstrating their essential role in safety-critical applications. This study contributes to establishing PINNs as an alternative smart grid modeling tool that combines data-driven flexibility with first-principles rigor, advances real-time grid control and scalable digital twins, and highlights the need for physics-aware architectures in mission-critical energy systems.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
We experimentally demonstrate that PINNs outperform data-driven models (XGBoost, Random Forest, and Linear Regression) in smart grid dynamic modeling.
Effectively addressing data shortage and physical consistency issues by training PINNs using a physics-based loss function.
The excellent generalization performance of PINNs contributes to the development of real-time grid control and scalable digital twins.
The properties of PINNs that maintain physical validity in safety-critical applications contribute to improved reliability.
Limitations:
PINNs may experience slight performance degradation under extreme operating conditions.
Additional experiments and validation are needed for various smart grid systems and operating conditions.
👍