This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide. All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis. Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.
Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Survey
Created by
Haebom
Author
Zhitian Hou, Zihan Ye, Nanli Zeng, Tianyong Hao, Kun Zeng
Outline
This paper focuses on large-scale language models (LLMs), which have made significant progress in the field of legal artificial intelligence (Legal AI) in recent years. To advance the research and application of LLM-based legal approaches, this paper provides a comprehensive review of 16 LLM series and 47 LLM-based legal task frameworks, and collects 15 benchmarks and 29 datasets to assess various legal competencies. Furthermore, it analyzes the challenges of LLM-based legal approaches and discusses future directions. It aims to provide a systematic introduction for beginners and encourage future research in this field. Related materials can be found at https://github.com/ZhitianHou/LLMs4LegalAI .
We provide a comprehensive review of the LLM in Law and related frameworks, benchmarks, and datasets to lay the foundation for Legal AI research.
◦
It presents the current status and future research directions of LLM-based legal approaches, thereby contributing to future research and development.
◦
We lower the barrier to entry into the field of Legal AI by providing systematic resources for beginners.
◦
Promote research reproducibility and sharing by sharing data through GitHub.
•
Limitations:
◦
The paper may lack detailed descriptions of objective evaluation criteria and methodologies for the LLM, frameworks, benchmarks, and datasets mentioned in the paper.
◦
Due to the rapidly evolving nature of the LLM field, new technologies and research findings may emerge after the paper is published, reducing the timeliness of the information.
◦
There may be a lack of in-depth discussion of bias issues and ethical considerations in the reviewed LLMs and frameworks.