Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

Challenges and Trends in Egocentric Vision: A Survey

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Xiang Li, Heqian Qiu, Lanxiao Wang, Hanwen Zhang, Chenghao Qi, Linfeng Han, Huiyu Xiong, Hongliang Li

Outline

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of research on egocentric vision understanding, which has been attracting attention due to advances in AI and wearable devices. Egocentric vision, which collects visual and multimodal data through body-worn cameras or sensors, offers a unique perspective for simulating the human visual experience. This paper systematically analyzes the components of egocentric scenes, categorizing tasks into four major areas—subject understanding, object understanding, environment understanding, and mixed understanding—and delves into the subtasks within each category. Furthermore, it summarizes key challenges and trends in this field and provides an overview of high-quality egocentric vision datasets, providing valuable resources for future research. By summarizing recent advances, it anticipates widespread applications of egocentric vision technology in fields such as augmented reality, virtual reality, and embodied intelligence, and suggests future research directions based on these latest developments.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Providing a systematic analysis and classification of egocentric visual understanding research.
Presenting key challenges, trends, and future research directions
Introducing a high-quality egocentric visual dataset
Suggesting application possibilities in various fields such as augmented reality, virtual reality, and implemented intelligence.
Limitations:
Since this paper summarizes research up to a specific point in time (the time of publication), it may not reflect subsequent research trends.
It is possible that not all relevant studies were comprehensively covered.
The proposed research direction may differ from the actual research direction.
👍