This paper argues that the minimal impact of AI adoption on corporate revenue growth (95% of companies do not report measurable revenue growth due to AI adoption) stems from the fact that AI strategies focus solely on incremental optimization, failing to achieve structural transformation. This paper proposes a 2x2 framework that reframes AI strategies based on two independent dimensions: the degree of transformation (incremental vs. transformational) and the mode of human contribution (reduced vs. augmented). The framework identifies four patterns: individual augmentation, process automation, human substitution, and collaborative intelligence. Specifically, the first three patterns reinforce existing work models and only bring localized benefits without creating sustainable value. Collaborative intelligence requires three mechanisms: complementarity, coevolution, and boundary setting. The paper analyzes the lack of coevolution as the reason for its limited system-wide impact. In conclusion, the evolution toward collaborative intelligence requires a physical restructuring of roles, governance, and data architecture, not just additional tools, reframing the AI transition as an organizational design problem: from optimizing the division of labor between humans and machines to designing their convergence.