Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Hudson de Martim

Outline

This paper presents the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph RAG) framework to address the Limitations challenge of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain. The simple text retrieval approach of existing RAG systems fails to account for the hierarchical, temporal, and causal structures of law, resulting in outdated and unreliable answers. SAT-Graph RAG addresses these challenges by explicitly modeling the formal structure and temporal characteristics of legal norms. Based on a formal knowledge graph inspired by the LRMoo model, it distinguishes between abstract legal documents and their versioned representations, efficiently aggregates temporal states, and reuses versioned representations of unchanged components. Furthermore, it embodies legislative events as primary action nodes, making causal relationships explicit and queryable. This structural foundation allows for the deterministic resolution of complex requests, such as (i) point-in-time retrieval, (ii) hierarchical impact analysis, and (iii) auditable provenance reconstruction, using a planner-guided, integrated query strategy. A case study of the Brazilian Constitution demonstrates that this approach provides a verifiable and time-accurate LLM foundation, enabling high-level analytical capabilities and significantly reducing the risk of factual errors. Consequently, it provides a practical framework for building more reliable and explainable legal AI systems.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Improving the reliability and explainability of legal domain RAG systems
Accurate information retrieval and analysis possible by considering the hierarchical, chronological, and causal structure of legal documents.
Provides various high-dimensional analysis functions such as point-in-time search, hierarchical influence analysis, and source reconstruction.
Providing a verifiable and timely LLM foundation
Presenting a practical framework for building more trustworthy and explainable legal AI systems.
Limitations:
The applicability of the presented framework is limited to the case study of the Brazilian Constitution. Further research is needed to determine its generalizability to other legal systems and document types.
Dependency on the LRMoo model. Compatibility and applicability with other legal ontology models need to be reviewed.
Consider the cost and effort involved in building and maintaining a knowledge graph. The difficulty of collecting and refining data is also a concern.
The complexity of the query strategy guided by the planner. The need for a user-friendly interface.
👍