Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Statistical learning does not always entail knowledge

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Daniel Andr es D iaz-Pach on, H. Renata Gallegos, Ola H ossjer, J. Sunil Rao

Outline

This paper studies agent learning and knowledge acquisition (LKA) for propositions that are either true or false, using a Bayesian approach. Agents receive data and update their beliefs about propositions based on a posterior distribution. LKA formulates data as active information, which modifies the agent's beliefs. It assumes that data provides detailed information about several features relevant to a proposition. This leads to a Gibbs distribution, which is the maximum entropy posterior distribution for the prior, subject to constraints imposed by the data on the features. It demonstrates that if the number of extracted features is too small, complete learning is impossible, and thus complete knowledge acquisition is impossible. Furthermore, it distinguishes between first-order learning (receiving data on features relevant to a proposition) and second-order learning (receiving data on the learning of other agents). It argues that this type of second-order learning does not represent true knowledge acquisition. The results of this study suggest that statistical learning algorithms have a Takeaways and that such algorithms do not always produce true knowledge. The theory is illustrated with several examples.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways: We present a theoretical model of agent learning and knowledge acquisition using a Bayesian approach and investigate the relationship between the number of data features and true knowledge acquisition. This suggests that statistical learning algorithms may not always produce true knowledge.
Limitations: Limitations suggest that complete learning and knowledge acquisition may not be possible due to the limited number of features. Further experimental verification is needed to verify the claim that secondary learning does not truly result in knowledge acquisition. The model's assumptions (e.g., the assumption that data provides detailed information about features relevant to propositions) need to be reviewed.
👍