Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planning

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Thomas Bolander, Alessandro Burigana, Marco Montali

Outline

This paper proposes a novel cognitive planning algorithm based on Dynamic Perception Logic (DEL). Its core principle is to limit the planning agent's inference depth to an upper bound b, ensuring that it can only infer about higher-order knowledge with dimensions up to b. By iteratively increasing b, we compute the plan requiring the lowest inference depth. We utilize a novel type of "canonical" b-similarity contraction to ensure a unique minimal model by construction. This ensures smaller states and efficient tracking of visited states compared to standard similarity contraction. We prove the correctness and completeness of the planning algorithm under an appropriate inference depth bound and show that the time complexity for b is (b+1)-EXPTIME. We implement the algorithm on DAEDALUS, a novel cognitive planning tool, and demonstrate significant performance improvements over the existing EFP 2.0 planning tool on several benchmarks.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Presenting the possibility of generating efficient plans by limiting the inference depth in dynamic recognition logic-based planning.
Computational cost reduction and performance improvement through a new b-similarity contraction technique.
Development of a new cognitive planning tool called DAEDALUS and demonstration of its performance superiority over existing tools.
Proof of correctness and completeness of planning algorithms under inference depth constraints.
Limitations:
Dependence on the inference depth upper bound b: Performance and accuracy can be affected by the setting of the value of b.
Time complexity of (b+1)-EXPTIME: As b increases, the amount of computation can increase exponentially.
Limitations of the experimental comparison: Only comparisons with EFP 2.0 are presented, so comparative analyses with a wider range of planning tools are needed.
Further research is needed on appropriate inference depth limits.
👍