Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

AI's Euclid's Elements Moment: From Language Models to Computable Thought

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Xinmin Fang, Lingfeng Tao, Zhengxiong Li

Outline

This paper proposes a five-stage evolution framework for the development of artificial intelligence (AI). Reflecting the historical development of human cognitive technology, it argues that AI does not develop gradually but undergoes innovative changes at each stage. Similar to the development of human cognitive technology such as ancient writing, alphabets, grammar and logic, calculus, and formal logic systems, AI goes through each stage through innovative changes in its representation and reasoning abilities. This “cognitive geometry” framework goes beyond a simple metaphor and provides a systematic and integrated model that explains the past structural changes of AI from past expert systems to transformers and suggests future development paths. In particular, it emphasizes that the evolution of AI is not simply linear but self-reflective. As AI develops, the tools and insights developed by AI create a feedback loop that fundamentally restructures the basic structure of AI itself. We are currently in the midst of a “metalinguistic moment” characterized by the emergence of self-reflective capabilities (Chain-of-Thought prompting, Constitutional AI, etc.), followed by a “mathematical symbolism moment” and a “formal logic systems moment”, leading to the development of a calculus of computable thought via neural symbol architecture and program synthesis, and to provably trustworthy AI that reconstructs its own underlying representations. This paper is the methodological conclusion to a three-part series that previously explored the economic drivers of AI (“why”) and the cognitive nature (“what”), providing a theoretical foundation for the “how” and offering concrete, practical strategies for startups and developers looking to build the next generation of intelligent systems.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Presenting a new framework for the step-by-step evolution of AI development and suggesting future research directions through it.
By emphasizing the self-reflective nature of AI development, it gives it meaning beyond mere technological advancement.
Providing concrete strategies for AI developers and startups.
Predicting the future of AI and suggesting long-term development directions through similarities between the development of human cognitive technology and the development of AI.
Limitations:
Lack of empirical evidence for the proposed five-step framework.
The transition points and criteria for each stage are unclear.
Lack of consideration of predictable uncertainty and unexpected contingencies in AI development.
Concepts such as “metalinguistic moment,” “mathematical symbolism moment,” and “formal logic system moment” are somewhat abstract.
👍