Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Anchoring AI Capabilities in Market Valuations: The Capability Realization Rate Model and Valuation Misalignment Risk

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Xinmin Fang, Lingfeng Tao, Zhengxiong Li

Outline

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of stock price increases in AI-related companies due to the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, and presents a 'capability realization rate (CRR)' model that quantifies the gap between AI's potential and actual performance. Focusing on the generative AI boom period from 2023 to 2025, we analyze stock price premiums and dissonance patterns through sensitivity analysis by industry sector and case studies of OpenAI, Adobe, NVIDIA, Meta, Microsoft, and Goldman Sachs. The results of the analysis show that AI-based companies are overvalued for their future potential, while existing companies adopting AI tend to be revalued based on actual earnings. The CRR model can help identify the risk of mismatch between market prices and AI-based realized values, and the paper concludes with policy recommendations for enhancing transparency, alleviating speculative bubbles, and harmonizing AI innovation with sustainable market value.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Quantitative analysis and modeling of the gap between overestimation of future potential and actual performance in stock valuation of AI companies.
Presenting the possibility of identifying mismatch risks in AI corporate valuation using the CRR model.
Provides policy recommendations to align AI innovation with sustainable market value.
Limitations:
Further validation of the generalizability and predictive accuracy of the CRR model is needed.
As the analysis period is limited (2023-2025), further research from a long-term perspective is needed.
Difficulty in generalizing due to the specificity of the case study companies.
👍