Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Using Artificial Intuition in Distinct, Minimalist Classification of Scientific Abstracts for Management of Technology Portfolios

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Prateek Ranka, Fred Morstatter, Alexandra Graddy-Reed, Andrea Belz

Outline

This paper highlights the difficulty of automating scientific abstract classification and proposes a process called "artificial intuition" to overcome the limitations of existing metadata utilization methods (sparse text, redundant labels). This method generates metadata using a large-scale language model (LLM), labels are generated using publicly available abstracts from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), and then applies the method to abstracts from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) to analyze research funding trends. The results demonstrate the feasibility of this method for strategic activities such as research portfolio management and technology discovery.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
LLM-powered 'artificial intuition' offers new possibilities for automating scientific abstract classification.
It demonstrates the potential of using NSF and NSFC abstract analysis to analyze research funding trends.
It can contribute to strategic activities such as research portfolio management and technology discovery.
Limitations:
Further verification of the accuracy and reliability of metadata generation using LLM is needed.
Since the results are limited to NSF and NSFC data, generalizability to other datasets must be verified.
A clear definition and scope of the concept of 'artificial intuition' is needed.
👍