Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Wei Zeng, Hengshu Zhu, Chuan Qin, Han Wu, Yihang Cheng, Sirui Zhang, Xiaowei Jin, Yinuo Shen, Zhenxing Wang, Feimin Zhong, Hui Xiong

Outline

This paper addresses the issue of value alignment in multi-agent systems based on large-scale language models (LLMs), particularly as AI research shifts from single-agent to multi-agent autonomous decision-making and collaborative work in complex environments. The advancement and diverse applications of LLMs have increased situational and systemic risks, making value alignment crucial to ensure that agents' goals, preferences, and behaviors align with human values and social norms. This paper addresses the need for social governance through a multi-layered value framework, comprehensively examining value alignment using LLM-based multi-agent systems as a representative prototype of agent AI systems. We structure value principles into a hierarchical structure at macro, meso, and micro levels, categorize application scenarios along a continuum from general to specific, and map value alignment methods and evaluations onto the hierarchical framework. Furthermore, we examine value coordination among multiple agents within agent AI systems in detail and suggest future research directions.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
A systematic review of the value alignment problem in LLM-based multi-agent systems and a multi-layered value framework.
Provides a comprehensive understanding through the hierarchical structure of value principles, categorization of application scenarios, mapping of value alignment methods and evaluations.
An in-depth discussion of the value coordination problem among multiple agents.
Contribution to academic development by suggesting future research directions.
Limitations:
Further validation of the practical application and effectiveness of the proposed multi-layered value framework is needed.
A comprehensive analysis of the various LLM and application scenarios may still be lacking.
Ongoing research is needed to ensure objectivity and reliability of value alignment methods and evaluations.
Lack of clear guidance on value conflicts and prioritization.
👍