Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

RLSR: Reinforcement Learning from Self Reward

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Toby Simonds, Kevin Lopez, Akira Yoshiyama, Dominique Garmier

Outline

This paper presents a novel method for improving the complex problem-solving ability of large-scale language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning. Conventional reinforcement learning requires verifiable reward signals, which are often costly and impractical in all domains. This study demonstrates that LLMs can utilize the asymmetry between generation and validation to self-judge and improve without a reference solution. By implementing self-judgement using countdown puzzles and integration problems, we achieve performance comparable to conventional validation methods. Specifically, the Qwen 2.5 7B DeepSeek Distilled model trained with self-reward achieved performance comparable to that achieved in the MIT Integration Bee competition. Combined with synthetic problem generation, we establish a complete self-improvement loop where the model generates, solves, and evaluates problems on its own. This demonstrates that reinforcement learning can be applied in numerous domains previously limited by the difficulty of reward design. This represents a significant step toward autonomous AI systems that continuously improve through self-directed learning without human intervention.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
We demonstrate that LLM can make decisions on its own without reference solutions and improve its performance through reinforcement learning.
It also suggests applicability in areas where reinforcement learning has been difficult due to difficulties in reward design.
Significant progress in developing autonomous AI systems through self-directed learning.
Building a complete self-improvement loop through synthetic problem generation.
Achieving MIT Integration Bee level performance.
Limitations:
Further research is needed to determine the generalizability of the self-judgment method presented in this study.
Applicability and performance verification for various problem types are required.
Further analysis is needed to determine the accuracy and reliability of self-assessment.
A review of the quality of self-generated problems is needed.
👍