This paper presents a counterargument to Jerry Fodor's radical concept nativism. Radical concept nativism claims that learning new concepts is impossible and that most concepts are innate. This paper examines the limitations of previous counterarguments and shows that radical concept nativism is inconsistent with actual human cognition in three key aspects related to expressive power, conceptual structure, and concept ownership. Using computer science and information theory, we formalize the relevant concepts more scientifically and ultimately support the idea that humans learn new concepts.