Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Don't Make It Up: Preserving Ignorance Awareness in LLM Fine-Tuning

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

William F. Shen, Xinchi Qiu, Nicola Cancedda, Nicholas D. Lane

Outline

This paper presents SEAT, a novel method to address the fatal forgetting problem that arises during fine-tuning of large-scale language models (LLMs). Unlike previous studies that focused on maintaining performance on existing data, this paper focuses on the loss of essential capabilities acquired during alignment, particularly the ability to accurately represent model uncertainty (ignorance awareness). The authors formalize the concept of ignorance awareness and show that existing fine-tuning methods can impair ignorance awareness by inducing activation drift, leading to undesirable behaviors such as hallucinations. SEAT integrates sparse tuning, which limits activation drift, and a novel entity perturbation method to resolve knowledge entanglement, effectively acquiring new knowledge while simultaneously maintaining aligned ignorance awareness. Experimental results show that SEAT outperforms existing methods in both ignorance awareness retention and fine-tuning performance on both real and synthetic datasets.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
In the LLM Fine Tuning course, the importance of ignorance awareness is emphasized and methods for quantitatively measuring and improving it are presented.
We reveal the Limitations of the existing fine tuning method and propose a new method, SEAT, to overcome it.
SEAT experimentally demonstrates that sparse tuning and entity perturbation methods simultaneously improve both ignorance recognition and fine-tuning performance.
Presenting a new direction for more robust and safe LLM fine tuning.
Limitations:
Further research is needed to determine how well SEAT's performance generalizes across different LLM architectures and datasets.
Further research is needed to determine the optimal parameters of the entity perturbation method.
An analysis of the computational cost and efficiency when applied to large-scale LLM is needed.
Further discussion may be needed regarding the definition and measurement of ignorance awareness.
👍