This study analyzes the gap in perceptions of AI between the general public (1,110 respondents) and AI experts (119 respondents) across 71 scenarios. For scenarios spanning a wide range of fields, including sustainability, healthcare, jobs, social inequality, art, and war, each group assessed the likelihood, risks, benefits, and overall value of AI. The results showed that experts rated AI's potential higher, risks lower, benefits higher, and a more positive attitude than the general public. Furthermore, experts tended to undervalue risks compared to non-experts. This study visually illustrates areas of agreement, such as medical diagnosis and criminal use, and areas of disagreement, such as legal judgments and political decision-making, highlighting the importance of understanding and addressing the gap in perception between developers and the public to align AI development with societal priorities.