Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Alexander Martin Mussgnug

Outline

This paper points out the tendency to ignore specific social contexts during the development and deployment of AI, and draws on Helen Nissenbaum's concept of contextual integrity to demonstrate how this neglect can lead to ethical problems. Specifically, it argues that efforts to promote responsible AI can paradoxically justify disregarding existing contextual norms, criticizing the phenomenon of AI ethics being treated as a new ethical domain. Instead, it advocates a more conservative approach that responsibly integrates AI within existing social contexts and normative structures, arguing that preserving existing ethics should be prioritized over innovation in AI ethics. This argument also applies to recently emerged foundation models.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways: Emphasizes the importance of existing social norms and ethical values in AI ethics discussions, suggesting that respect for existing norms and responsible integration should be prioritized over mere innovation. It presents a more realistic approach to AI ethics applicable even to new technologies, such as foundational models.
Limitations: The specific content and application criteria of the "conservative approach" may be unclear. It may lack specific solutions to address the conflicts and coordination issues between diverse social contexts and norms. It may also lack consideration for cases where existing norms themselves are unfair or problematic.
👍