Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Towards Robust Stability Prediction in Smart Grids: GAN-based Approach under Data Constraints and Adversarial Challenges

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Emad Efatinasab, Alessandro Brighente, Denis Donadel, Mauro Conti, Mirco Rampazzo

Outline

This paper presents a novel framework to maintain the stability of smart grids. While conventional smart grid stability assessment faces the difficulty of securing real unstable data, this study generates Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) samples representing unstable states using only stable data through Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). Using the generated OOD samples, we learn robust decision boundaries that distinguish between stable and unstable states, and additionally enhance resilience against attacks through adversarial training. The evaluation results using real datasets show that we achieve up to 98.1% stability prediction accuracy and 98.9% adversarial attack detection accuracy, and that real-time decision making is possible with an average response time of less than 7 ms on a single-board computer.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
A new approach to address the lack of unstable data required for smart grid stability assessment
Effectively modeling unstable conditions using only stable data using GAN
Ensuring high stability against cyber attacks through adversarial training
Presenting the possibility of implementing a practical system that can monitor and control smart grid stability in real time
Limitations:
Further verification of the generalization performance of the proposed GAN model is needed.
Need to assess and improve resistance to various types of adversarial attacks
Additional research is needed on long-term stability and reliability in real smart grid environments.
Lack of clear description of the nature and scale of the actual dataset used.
👍