Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Hardness-Aware Dynamic Curriculum Learning for Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition with Missing Modalities

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Rui Liu, Haolin Zuo, Zheng Lian, Hongyu Yuan, Qi Fan

Outline

This paper proposes HARDY-MER, a hardness-aware dynamic curriculum learning framework, to address the multimodal emotion recognition (MER) problem with missing modalities. Existing missing modality reconstruction methods have limitations in that they fail to account for differences in reconstruction difficulty across samples. HARDY-MER consists of two stages: assessing sample difficulty and strategically emphasizing difficult samples for learning. Sample difficulty is measured through a multi-perspective difficulty assessment mechanism that considers direct difficulty (modality reconstruction error) and indirect difficulty (cross-modal mutual information). The learning process is regulated through a retrieval-based dynamic curriculum learning strategy that searches for samples with similar semantic information and adjusts the learning weight between easy and difficult samples. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that HARDY-MER outperforms existing methods.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
A novel approach to the problem of multimodal emotion recognition with missing modalities is presented.
Demonstrating the effectiveness of a dynamic curriculum learning strategy that improves learning efficiency by considering the difficulty of the sample.
More accurate sample difficulty measurement is possible through a multi-perspective difficulty evaluation mechanism.
We present a HARDY-MER model that outperforms existing methods and provide open source code.
Limitations:
Further research is needed to determine the generality of the proposed difficulty assessment mechanism and its applicability to various datasets.
There is a potential for bias towards certain types of missing modalities.
Experimental results on large datasets may be lacking.
Further comparative analysis with other curriculum learning strategies may be needed.
👍