Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Alexander David Goldie, Zilin Wang, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster, Shimon Whiteson

Outline

This paper focuses on reinforcement learning (RL), especially, in a context where learning meta-learning algorithms from data instead of the conventional manual design method is gaining attention as a paradigm for improving the performance of machine learning systems. Reinforcement learning algorithms are often derived from suboptimal supervised or unsupervised learning, but meta-learning offers a possibility to solve this problem. This study experimentally compares and analyzes different meta-learning algorithms, such as evolutionary algorithms for black-box function optimization and large-scale language models (LLMs) for code suggestion, applied to various RL pipelines. In addition to the meta-learning and meta-testing performance, we investigate factors such as interpretability, sample cost, and training time, and propose some guidelines for meta-learning more performant RL algorithms in the future.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways: We present an efficient meta-learning strategy for developing reinforcement learning algorithms through comparative analysis of various meta-learning algorithms. We present future research directions by comprehensively considering the performance, interpretability, and efficiency of meta-learning algorithms.
Limitations: This may be an experimental result limited to a specific RL pipeline and algorithm. Generalizability to various RL environments and problems should be further verified. Further research is needed on the generality and applicability of the presented guidelines.
👍