Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

The DNA of nuclear models: How AI predicts nuclear masses

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Kate A. Richardson, Sokratis Trifinopoulos, Mike Williams

Outline

High-precision prediction of nuclear mass, or nuclear binding energy ($E_b$), remains a key goal in nuclear physics research. Many AI-based tools have recently shown promising results on this task, some achieving accuracies exceeding the best physical models. However, the usefulness of AI models is questionable, given that predictions are only useful in the absence of measurements. This inherently requires extrapolation from training (and test) samples. Because AI models are often black boxes, the reliability of these extrapolations is difficult to assess. In this study, we present an AI model that not only achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for $E_b$ but also does so in an interpretable manner. For example, we demonstrate that the most important dimension of the model's internal representation is the double helix, linking the numbers of protons and neutrons found in the most stable nuclei in each isotope chain, analogous to hydrogen bonds in DNA. We explain why. Furthermore, we demonstrate that AI predictions of $E_b$ can be hierarchically factored and sorted, with the most significant terms corresponding to well-known symbolic models (e.g., the famous liquid droplet model). Remarkably, the AI model's improvement over the symbolic model can be attributed almost entirely to Jaffe's 1969 observations of the structure of most known nuclear ground states. This results in a fully interpretable, data-driven nuclear mass model based on the physics inferred by AI.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Developing an interpretable AI model that achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for predicting $E_b$.
We found that the internal representation of the AI model forms a double helix structure, providing insights into nuclear structure.
Improvements in AI models stem from Jaffe's observations, suggesting that AI could contribute to discovering physical knowledge.
Increase interpretability by linking AI predictions to symbolic models.
Limitations:
Limitations is not explicitly mentioned in the paper (because only the abstract of the paper is provided).
👍