Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

Rethinking the Vulnerability of Concept Erasure and a New Method

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Alex D. Richardson, Kaicheng Zhang, Lucas Beerens, Dongdong Chen

Outline

The proliferation of text-to-image diffusion models has raised privacy and security concerns related to copyright infringement and the creation of harmful images. To address these issues, concept deletion (defense) methods have been developed to "forget" specific concepts. However, recent concept restoration (offensive) methods have shown that these deleted concepts can be restored using adversarially crafted prompts, exposing a critical vulnerability in current defense mechanisms. In this study, we first investigate the root cause of this adversarial vulnerability and reveal that this vulnerability is pervasive in the prompt embedding space of concept deletion models, a characteristic inherited from the original pretrained model. We also introduce RECORD, a novel coordinate descent-based restoration algorithm that consistently outperforms existing restoration methods by up to 17.8x . We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the computational-performance tradeoff and propose acceleration strategies.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Points out the vulnerability of the concept deletion defense mechanism and emphasizes its vulnerability to adversarial attacks.
We reveal that vulnerabilities in the prompt embedding space are at the heart of the problem.
We propose a new restoration algorithm called RECORD, which shows improved performance compared to existing methods.
Computation-performance trade-off analysis and acceleration strategy proposal.
Limitations:
Detailed information about the specific methodology, experimental setup, and results of the presented study is not included in the abstract.
There may be a lack of discussion about the practical applicability of the model.
The scope of the research may be limited to a specific model, dataset, or attack method.
👍