Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

Continuous Thought Machines

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Luke Darlow, Ciaran Regan, Sebastian Risi, Jeffrey Seely, Llion Jones

Outline

Inspired by the complex neural activity of the biological brain, we present the Continuous Thought Machine (CTM) model, which utilizes neural dynamics as its core representation. CTM offers two innovations: (1) neuron-level temporal processing, where each neuron processes input history using its own weight parameters, and (2) neural synchronization as a latent representation. CTM operates at a level of abstraction that effectively captures essential temporal dynamics while maintaining computational efficiency, demonstrating performance and versatility across a variety of tasks, including 2D maze solving, ImageNet-1K classification, and parity calculation. Furthermore, it can perform tasks requiring complex sequential reasoning and leverages adaptive computing, allowing early termination for simple tasks and continued computation for more challenging ones. Rather than pursuing state-of-the-art results, CTM aims to be a significant step toward developing more biologically plausible and robust artificial intelligence systems.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
An attempt to mimic the properties of the biological brain by leveraging neuron-level temporal processing and neural synchronization.
Demonstrated performance on various tasks (2D mazes, ImageNet classification, parity calculation, etc.).
Complex sequential reasoning ability.
Potential for improved efficiency through adaptive computing.
Ease of interpretation of the model's internal processes.
Limitations:
The goal of this paper is to share models, not to achieve state-of-the-art results.
Possible lack of detailed information on specific performance comparisons and limitations.
It cannot fully mimic all the complexities of the biological brain.
Lack of information on actual implementation and computational costs.
👍