Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

Semantic Discrepancy-aware Detector for Image Forgery Identification

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Ziye Wang, Minghang Yu, Chunyan Xu, Zhen Cui

Outline

As advances in image generation technology have made counterfeit image detection increasingly important, we address the issue of mismatches between the counterfeit and semantic concept spaces. While the semantic concepts learned by pre-trained models are crucial for identifying fake images, mismatches between the counterfeit and semantic concept spaces hinder detection performance. To address this issue, we propose a Semantic Discrepancy-aware Detector (SDD), which utilizes reconstruction learning to align the two spaces at a fine-grained visual level. Leveraging conceptual knowledge embedded in a pre-trained vision language model, SDD designs a semantic token sampling module that mitigates spatial shifts caused by features unrelated to both counterfeit traces and semantic concepts. Furthermore, a concept-level counterfeit mismatch learning module based on a visual reconstruction paradigm enhances the interaction between visual semantic concepts and counterfeit traces, effectively capturing mismatches guided by concepts. Furthermore, by incorporating concept-level counterfeit mismatches learned through low-level counterfeit feature enhancement, we minimize unnecessary counterfeit information. Experimental results on two standard image counterfeit datasets demonstrate that SDD outperforms existing methods.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Improving image forgery detection performance by leveraging semantic concepts from pre-trained models.
A novel approach to address the mismatch between counterfeiting and semantic concept space (based on reconfiguration learning).
Improving forgery detection performance through various module designs (semantic token sampling, concept-level forgery mismatch learning, low-level forgery feature enhancement).
Demonstrated superior performance compared to existing methods.
Limitations:
There is no Limitations specified in the paper.
👍