Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

A Markov Categorical Framework for Language Modeling

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Yifan Zhang

Outline

Autoregressive language models demonstrate impressive performance, but a unified theory explaining their internal mechanisms, how training shapes representations, and how complex behaviors are enabled remains lacking. This paper presents a novel analytical framework that models single-step generation as a composition of information processing stages using Markov categorical language. This compositional perspective provides a unified mathematical language that connects three key aspects of language modeling, typically studied separately: the training objective, the geometry of the learned representation space, and the actual model functionality. First, this framework provides a precise information-theoretic basis for the success of multi-token prediction methods such as speculative decoding, quantifying the information surplus that the model's hidden state contains about tokens beyond the immediate next token. Second, it clarifies how the standard Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) objective forces the model to learn not only the next word but also the inherent conditional uncertainty of the data, formalizing this using categorical entropy. Our main result demonstrates that minimizing the NLL, assuming a linear softmax head and bounded features, leads to spectral alignment: the learned representation space aligns with the inherent spectrum of the prediction similarity operator. This study provides powerful new insights into how information flows through a model and how training objectives shape its internal geometry.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
A new analytical framework is presented to understand the internal mechanisms of language models.
Providing information-theoretic rationale for the success of multi-token prediction methods.
Clarify how the NLL objective guides learning about the conditional uncertainty of the data.
Identifying the relationship between the learned representation space and the eigenspectrum of the predicted similarity operator (spectral alignment).
Contributes to understanding how information flow and training objectives in language models shape their internal structure.
Limitations:
Includes assumptions about linear softmax heads and bounded features.
May be limited to specific model architectures and training settings.
The presented framework may not fully explain the behavior of all language models.
👍