Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Explaining Time Series Classifiers with PHAR: Rule Extraction and Fusion from Post-hoc Attributions

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Maciej Mozolewski, Szymon Bobek, Grzegorz J. Nalepa

Outline

Post-hoc Attribution Rules (PHAR) is an integrated framework for enhancing the explainability of time series classification models. It transforms numerical feature importance derived from existing post-hoc, instance-wise explanation techniques (e.g., LIME, SHAP) into structured rules that are easily understood by humans. These rules enhance model transparency by defining interpretable intervals indicating where and when critical decision boundaries occur. PHAR performs similarly to existing rule-based methods, such as Anchor, while scaling more efficiently to long time series sequences and achieving broader instance coverage. A dedicated rule fusion step, which integrates rule sets using strategies such as weight selection and Lasso-based refinement, balances key quality metrics such as coverage, confidence, and simplicity. This fusion provides concise, unambiguous rules for each instance, improving both explanation fidelity and consistency. It also introduces a visualization technique that illustrates the specificity-generalization tradeoff in the derived rules. PHAR resolves the conflicting and overlapping explanations common to the Rashomon phenomenon with consistent, domain-specific insights. Comprehensive experiments on the UCR/UEA time series classification archive demonstrate that PHAR improves interpretability, decision transparency, and practical applicability for time series classification tasks.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
A novel framework for improving interpretability of time series classification models is presented.
Converting the results of existing post-hoc explanation techniques into rules that are easy for humans to understand.
Efficiently scalable to long time-series sequences and provides wide instance coverage.
Resolving conflicting explanations and providing consistent insights.
Experimental validation using the UCR/UEA dataset.
Limitations:
This paper does not explicitly address specific Limitations issues. Further experimental and comparative analysis is needed to further clarify Limitations issues (e.g., performance degradation on certain types of time series data, compatibility issues with certain explanation techniques, etc.).
👍