This paper argues that scientific recommendation systems such as Google Scholar and Web of Science have caused a "rich get richer, poor get poorer" phenomenon in which a small number of popular papers are overexposed due to popularity-based algorithms, which promotes intellectual homogeneity and exacerbates structural inequalities, thereby suppressing innovative and diverse perspectives essential for scientific progress. Therefore, we propose that search platforms be improved to allow for manual adjustment of factors such as popularity, recency, and relevance through user-tailored adjustments, and that text embeddings and LLMs be implemented in a way that increases user autonomy. These suggestions are particularly important for the alignment of scientific value and recommendation systems, but can also be broadly applied to general information access systems.