Second Place is Desperate: A Look at China's AI Crisis in Beijing
- Haebom
2
Haebom's Archive
Coaching resumes.
- Haebom
🎄To celebrate Christmas, we are releasing articles previously available only to members for free.
- Haebom
🎄 People who have nothing to do on Christmas, come here
- Haebom
Curiosity
- Haebom
5
🟣 When the conversation starts again
- Haebom
🎖 Time Magazine's Greatest Inventions of 2025
- Haebom
It's the "hardware", stupid
- Haebom
1
Cost Golden Cross in the Content Market
- Haebom
Light things I made during the holidays
- Haebom
In SaaS, competition is about "systems," not "wills."
- Haebom
10 Dangerous Misconceptions About Vibe Coding: The Characteristics of Language Models
- Haebom
The KakaoTalk reorganization shouldn't be used as a trigger for a firestorm like this.
- Haebom
5
Marriage with an AI lover?
- Haebom
Vibe Coding Cleanup: The Birth of a New Tech Side Hustle Ecosystem
- Haebom
The Evolution of AI UX: From Invisible Magic to Inevitable Experiences
- Haebom
Things I thought about over the weekend
- Haebom
2
Albania Appoints World's First AI Minister: A Dilemma: The Reality vs. the Fantasy of a Corruption-Free Government
- Haebom
Meta Ray-Ban Display: Zuckerberg's Vision for the Future of Computing
- Haebom
Publication Announcement for "People Who Entrust Their Thoughts"
- Haebom
1
haebom
해봄의 아카이브
The KakaoTalk reorganization shouldn't be used as a trigger for a firestorm like this.
Haebom
A learning challenge posed by the entire nation's Q&A
TL;DR
•
This reorganization represents a major clash between the differing perspectives of general users and IT makers . Both perspectives must be considered together .
•
The public judges things as "if it's uncomfortable, don't use it; if it's comfortable, use it," but the industry must thoroughly investigate why these decisions were made and what lessons can be learned . The Toss origins and advertising media are more like ingredients than the starting point of these problems.
•
This event was essentially a massive user test targeting the entire nation , and the data and experiences gained from it became key insights for future product decisions . If you're not in the IT industry, you might simply dismiss this as news, but if you are, consider it.
https://youtu.be/KSR3h8Pd5-I?si=rhMgDNesm1oY0FwF
The recent large-scale reorganization of KakaoTalk has sparked much debate. I define this reorganization as a "national QA (quality assurance)" and see it as a significant event with much to learn from IT professionals. Beyond simply expressing dissatisfaction among general users, I emphasize the need for an in-depth analysis of the impact of this reorganization on Korean society and the IT industry. KakaoTalk has declared itself a "national messenger" and attempted such a drastic change because the service has become an integral part of our daily lives. Kakao is also aware that users cannot easily switch to alternatives, and this has created a dilemma where users have no choice but to continue using the service despite their dissatisfaction.
The Challenges of Short-Form Adoption: User Experience and Platform Nature
The introduction of the "short-form" feature has been particularly controversial in this reorganization. I argue that short-form content forces customers into experiences they don't want . Unlike platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, which are primarily focused on content consumption, KakaoTalk open chatrooms are primarily spaces for information exchange and communication, and the problem is that Showform is placed in an auto-play mode. A bigger problem with the introduction of Showform is that it grants content uploading authority only to a select few influencers . This is similar to the failure of Naver's "Me2day" in the past due to preferential treatment given to celebrity accounts, critics say. They emphasize that the essence of social media is "connection" and providing exposure opportunities to everyone , but KakaoTalk has forgotten this and has adopted a "violent" approach that only gives opportunities to a select few.
Understanding Advertising Revenue Models and the Economic Situation
In response to criticisms about the increased advertising, the speaker emphasizes that most platform companies fundamentally generate revenue through advertising . While securing advertising space is a natural strategy, market conditions are crucial. He analyzes that simply increasing advertising space won't lead to explosive sales growth, as marketing costs shrink in difficult economic times. He also mentions models like YouTube Premium, where users pay to avoid ads, and questions whether KakaoTalk provides enough value for users to be willing to pay for it . Given the failures of various content initiatives in the past, such as Kakao TV and Kakao Music, he argues that providing new value beyond advertising is crucial.
Kakao's sense of crisis and decision-making problems
Kakao's recent reorganization was driven by a sense of crisis about technological change and the flow of the times . The explanation is that amidst the rapid rise of AI technologies like ChatGPT, Kakao likely felt it was failing to demonstrate its new value as a "technology company" to users. This sense of crisis likely served as a catalyst for change, much like the "determination to save the nation." The author believes that despite the catchphrase for this reorganization being "customized," the original intent wasn't properly conveyed due to features like Showform . While some useful features, such as folder management and splitting PC KakaoTalk open chats, have been added, they haven't received much attention due to the negative experiences with Showform.
The Truth and Falsehood of Blind Criticism: The Dangers of Personal Blame
The speaker expresses concern about the torrent of criticism directed at the CPO and team, who hail from Toss, on Blind. He emphasizes that no product is released solely through the decisions of one or two individuals , but rather involves numerous processes and team efforts. He also points out that the term "Kamuwon" (카무원) is not a neologism coined by Toss alumni, but rather has long been used self-deprecatingly within large corporations. He criticizes the culture of "demonizing" and harassing specific individuals as reminiscent of the violent culture in the gaming industry . While the satire of game directors was directed at those with absolute power, like "kings," the current criticism of the CPO goes beyond mere satire and borders on unjustified personal attacks. He argues that such personal attacks hinder constructive discussion and hinder progress. He also cautions against automatically accepting insider comments as truth , citing the difficulty in verifying whether the writer of a Blind post is an actual IT product expert . He adds that just as increased ad exposure doesn't necessarily translate into increased sales, it's important to understand that there are complex development roadmaps where user dissatisfaction doesn't necessarily lead to immediate rollbacks.
Lack of communication about change and future direction
I point out that one of the biggest problems with the recent KakaoTalk reorganization is the lack of user communication about the changes . Global services like Instagram, TikTok, and WhatsApp explain the context and rationale behind updates in detail, disclose their release roadmaps in advance, and persuade users. In contrast, KakaoTalk unilaterally pushed through updates with claims like, " It's changed now, " leading to confusion and backlash. I also cite Naver's past experience with major reorganizations, which faced significant user backlash, but ultimately accepted and implemented the changes, emphasizing that change always comes with inconvenience . However, I acknowledge that Kakao's recent reorganization was overly aggressive and compromised core functionality, a clear mistake. I suggest that Kakao should learn from this incident by adopting a user-centric roadmap disclosure and a phased update approach . Similar to the gaming industry, it needs to incorporate sensitive user feedback, conduct pre-launch testing, and explain the context of the changes. While Kakao may have hesitated to communicate due to its past failure to deliver on promises, I analyze that this ultimately led to greater backlash. In conclusion, I believe this major reorganization of KakaoTalk is a significant opportunity that can serve as a lesson not only for Kakao but also for the entire IT industry . I urge everyone to go beyond mere criticism and reflect on why this outcome occurred and move forward in a constructive manner. I emphasize that while criticizing others is easy, solving real problems is much more difficult.
Subscribe to 'haebom'
📚 Welcome to Haebom's archives.
---
I post articles related to IT 💻, economy 💰, and humanities 🎭.
If you are curious about my thoughts, perspectives or interests, please subscribe.
haebom@kakao.com
---
I post articles related to IT 💻, economy 💰, and humanities 🎭.
If you are curious about my thoughts, perspectives or interests, please subscribe.
haebom@kakao.com
5
향
향기로운 라벤더 야생화
어떻게 본인 생각이 없이 AI가 써준 글 그대로 복붙한게 다보이지ㅋㅋㅋ
Haebom
유튜브를 촬영하고 그것을 LiveWiki로 요약해 올렸습니다. 한 시간 동안 제 생각을 열심히 말하고 그걸 요약했는데 그렇게 보였다면 죄송합니다.
이
이름 없는 황갈 서리
ㅋㅋㅋ
W
wonje_choi
"어떤 프로덕트도 한두 명의 개인의 의사결정만으로 배포되지 않으며" 라는 부분 공감가는 사람이 몇이나 있을까...
Haebom
제가 배운 Project Manage에서는 적어도 안그랬습니다. 물론, 철저한 개인적 경험입니다. 넥슨/한화/카카오 등의 경우에는 배포 전에 수많은 Approver가 존재하고 어사인 안받으면 아무리 급해도 빌드를 못타는 경우도 존재했기에 그렇게 표현했습니다. 말씀처럼 한 두 명의 개인의 의사결정으로 배포가 된다면, 첫째 이러한 CI/CD 프로세스가 제대로 준비되지 않은 곳이거나, 둘째 구성원들이 그 프로세스에 참여를 안하고 있는 상황일 것 입니다.
See latest comments