[공지사항]을 빙자한 안부와 근황 
Show more

Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Hao Sun, Mihaela van der Schaar

Outline

This paper comprehensively reviews recent research trends on the alignment problem of large-scale language models (LLMs) from an inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) perspective. It highlights the differences between reinforcement learning techniques used in LLM alignment and those used in traditional reinforcement learning tasks, and in particular discusses the necessity of constructing neural network reward models from human data and the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift. After introducing the basic concepts of reinforcement learning, we cover practical aspects of IRL for LLM alignment, including recent advances, key challenges and opportunities, datasets, benchmarks, evaluation metrics, infrastructures, and computationally efficient training and inference techniques. Based on the research results on sparse reward reinforcement learning, we suggest open challenges and future directions. By synthesizing various research results, we aim to provide a structured and critical overview of the field, highlight unresolved challenges, and suggest promising future directions for improving LLM alignment with RL and IRL techniques.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Provides a comprehensive review of recent advances in IRL for LLM alignment.
Clarify the differences between reinforcement learning in LLM alignment and conventional reinforcement learning.
We emphasize the importance of constructing a neural network reward model based on human data.
We consider practical aspects such as datasets, benchmarks, evaluation metrics, and infrastructure.
Based on research on scarce reward reinforcement learning, we suggest future research directions.
Limitations:
Since this paper itself is a pre-print paper that has not yet been published, verification of actual research results is required.
Although it presents a comprehensive overview of the various research findings, it may lack in-depth discussion of individual studies Limitations.
It is possible to have a biased view of a particular IRL technique or LLM alignment method.
Because this is a rapidly developing field, new research findings may emerge after the paper is published, making some of the discussion outdated.
👍