[공지사항]을 빙자한 안부와 근황 
Show more

Daily Arxiv

This is a page that curates AI-related papers published worldwide.
All content here is summarized using Google Gemini and operated on a non-profit basis.
Copyright for each paper belongs to the authors and their institutions; please make sure to credit the source when sharing.

Ready Jurist One: Benchmarking Language Agents for Legal Intelligence in Dynamic Environments

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Zheng Jia, Shengbin Yue, Wei Chen, Siyuan Wang, Yidong Liu, Yun Song, Zhongyu Wei

Outline

To bridge the gap between the dynamic nature of real-world legal practice and static benchmarks, this paper introduces J1-ENVS, the first interactive dynamic legal environment for LLM-based agents. It consists of six representative scenarios from Chinese legal practice across three levels of environmental complexity, guided by legal experts. We also present J1-EVAL, a fine-grained evaluation framework designed to assess task performance and procedural compliance across different levels of legal proficiency. Extensive experiments on 17 LLM agents show that many models demonstrate robust legal knowledge but struggle with procedural execution in dynamic environments. Even the state-of-the-art model, GPT-4o, falls short of 60% overall performance. These results highlight ongoing challenges in achieving dynamic legal intelligence and provide valuable insights for future research.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Presentation of a new evaluation environment J1-ENVS and evaluation framework J1-EVAL that reflect the dynamics of actual legal practice.
Provides empirical analysis of the legal knowledge and procedural execution capabilities of LLM-based agents.
Challenges in achieving dynamic legal intelligence and future research directions.
Limitations:
Evaluation Environment J1-ENVS is structured based on Chinese legal practice, limiting generalizability to other legal systems.
The number of models evaluated is limited to 17, and further research on more diverse models is needed.
The performance of state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4o, is still below 60%, suggesting that further research and development is needed to improve dynamic legal intelligence.
👍