Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

From Feedback to Checklists: Grounded Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Karen Zhou, John Giorgi, Pranav Mani, Peng Xu, Davis Liang, Chenhao Tan

Outline

To address the challenges of assessing the quality of AI-generated clinical notes, this paper proposes a pipeline that systematically extracts real-world user feedback into a structured checklist. This checklist is designed to be interpretable, based on human feedback, and applicable to LLM-based evaluators. Experiments using over 21,000 clinical records demonstrate that the proposed checklist outperforms existing evaluation methods.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Development of a Clinical Note Evaluation Checklist Using Real-World User Feedback
Presenting an interpretable and actionable assessment methodology for LLM-based evaluators.
Demonstrated superior performance compared to existing evaluation methods
Providing a practical tool for detecting declines in clinical note quality.
Limitations:
Specific Limitations is not mentioned in the paper (based on the Abstract content)
👍