Daily Arxiv

This page organizes papers related to artificial intelligence published around the world.
This page is summarized using Google Gemini and is operated on a non-profit basis.
The copyright of the paper belongs to the author and the relevant institution. When sharing, simply cite the source.

Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process

Created by
  • Haebom

Author

Jing Yang

Outline

The surge in paper submissions to top artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) conferences has led many venues to transition from closed to open review platforms. This paper analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of these models and highlights the growing community interest in transparent peer review. Leveraging insights from the Paper Copilot website, we advocate for transparent, open, and well-regulated peer review, aiming to foster greater community engagement and advance the field.

Takeaways, Limitations

Takeaways:
Growing interest in transparent peer review in AI/ML fields.
The importance of data-driven analytics through platforms like Paper Copilot.
The potential to foster community engagement and development through open peer review.
Limitations:
The specific Limitations is not stated in the abstract (although the paper does mention analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the open peer review model).
👍